Gartner Magic Quadrant Managed File Transfer 2009
Gartner rates vendors upon two criteria: completeness of and ability to execute. Using a methodology which Gartner does not disclose , these component scores lead to a vendor position in one of four quadrants:.
- Gartner Magic Quadrant Managed File Transfer 2009 Download
- Managed File Transfer Gartner
- Managed File Transfer Axway
Leaders – Vendors in the Leaders quadrant have the highest composite scores for their Completeness of Vision and Ability to Execute. A vendor in the Leaders quadrant has the market share, credibility, and marketing & sales capabilities needed to drive the acceptance of new technologies. These vendors demonstrate a clear understanding of market needs, they are innovators and thought leaders, and they have well-articulated plans that customers and prospects can use when designing their infrastructures and strategies. In addition, they have a presence in the five major geographical regions, consistent financial performance, and broad platform support.
Challengers – A vendor in the Challengers quadrant participates in the market and executes well enough to be a serious threat to vendors in the Leaders quadrant. They have strong products, as well as sufficiently credible market position and resources to sustain continued growth. Financial viability is not an issue for vendors in the Challengers quadrant, but they lack the size and influence of vendors in the Leaders quadrant. Visionaries – A vendor in the Visionaries quadrant delivers innovative products that address operationally or financially important end-user problems at a broad scale, but has not yet demonstrated the ability to capture market share or sustainable profitability. Visionary vendors are frequently privately held companies and acquisition targets for larger, established companies. The likelihood of acquisition often reduces the risks associated with installing their systems. Niche Players – Vendors in the Niche Players quadrant are often narrowly focused on specific market or vertical segments.
This quadrant may also include vendors that are adapting their existing products to enter the market under consideration, or larger vendors having difficulty developing and executing on their vision.Criticism. It has been pointed out that the criteria for the Magic Quadrant cater more towards and large vendors than towards buyers.Much of the criticism is focused on the lack of disclosure of the money received from the vendors it rates, raising issues. February 2008. Retrieved 2009-07-27.
Retrieved 2009-08-08. Retrieved 2015-02-24. Retrieved 2009-08-08. Retrieved 2015-02-24. Retrieved 2015-02-24. Retrieved 2015-02-24.
Retrieved 2015-02-24. Retrieved 2009-08-08. Www.gartner.com. Www.gartner.com. Www.gartner.com. Www.gartner.com.
^. Gartner. Gartner.
Gartner Magic Quadrant Managed File Transfer 2009 Download
Www.gartner.com. Www.gartner.com. External links.
Contents.Rating Gartner rates vendors upon two criteria: completeness of and ability to execute. Using a methodology which Gartner does not disclose , these component scores lead to a vendor position in one of four quadrants:. Leaders – Vendors in the Leaders quadrant have the highest composite scores for their Completeness of Vision and Ability to Execute. A vendor in the Leaders quadrant has the market share, credibility, and marketing & sales capabilities needed to drive the acceptance of new technologies. These vendors demonstrate a clear understanding of market needs, they are innovators and thought leaders, and they have well-articulated plans that customers and prospects can use when designing their infrastructures and strategies. In addition, they have a presence in the five major geographical regions, consistent financial performance, and broad platform support.
Challengers – A vendor in the Challengers quadrant participates in the market and executes well enough to be a serious threat to vendors in the Leaders quadrant. They have strong products, as well as sufficiently credible market position and resources to sustain continued growth. Financial viability is not an issue for vendors in the Challengers quadrant, but they lack the size and influence of vendors in the Leaders quadrant. Visionaries – A vendor in the Visionaries quadrant delivers innovative products that address operationally or financially important end-user problems at a broad scale, but has not yet demonstrated the ability to capture market share or sustainable profitability.
Visionary vendors are frequently privately held companies and acquisition targets for larger, established companies. The likelihood of acquisition often reduces the risks associated with installing their systems. Niche Players – Vendors in the Niche Players quadrant are often narrowly focused on specific market or vertical segments. This quadrant may also include vendors that are adapting their existing products to enter the market under consideration, or larger vendors having difficulty developing and executing on their vision.Criticism It has been pointed out that the criteria for the Magic Quadrant cater more towards and large vendors than towards buyers.Much of the criticism is focused on the lack of disclosure of the money received from the vendors it rates, raising issues. February 2008. Retrieved 2009-07-27. Retrieved 2009-08-08.
Managed File Transfer Gartner
Retrieved 2015-02-24. Retrieved 2009-08-08. Retrieved 2015-02-24. Retrieved 2015-02-24. Retrieved 2015-02-24.
Retrieved 2015-02-24. Retrieved 2009-08-08. Www.gartner.com.
Managed File Transfer Axway
Www.gartner.com. Www.gartner.com. Www.gartner.com. ^. Gartner. Gartner.
Www.gartner.com. Www.gartner.com. External links.